So, seeing as this is properly a philosophy and art blog, I feel compelled to bring about the most obvious question for this scene: what is the proper medium for discussing philosophy?  I can accept that there are different channels for different branches, but then the question just arises as many times as there are distinct branches of philosophy. Because, truth be told, Kant doesn’t do it for me.  Sure, his work is brilliant, and his logic is sound, but the way he discusses it and presents it lends itself to only the higher echelons of society’s understanding.  And is that … Continue reading Ethics

So how do we think then?  Well, that’s not exactly what I mean.  The whole physicality of the mechanisms of thought don’t interest me any more than a snail’s anatomy .  No, what interests me is authenticity, to be clear.  Clearly pretentious and a fan of pseudo-intellectualism, you might be thinking, but that’s precisely my point. No it’s not.  I don’t know even why I said that.  Maybe at a hope for some sort of a sense of leading a literary life.  I’m hoping for coincidence to coincide with my idea of the way the world works.  But this is an impasse and … Continue reading Kaleidoscope glasses